on a facebook discussion board, this question from ali naderzad:
Why do most French understand that the death penalty is barbaric and so many Americans still think it's the only way to go in certain cases?here's my response:
that’s a fascinating question, ali. i've been thinking about it a good bit. sorry this post is so long.
i’m not qualified to compare the cultures. though i am proud to say i was conceived in france, i didn’t stick around long enough to be knowledgeable about the culture. here are a few thoughts on american culture.
1. the cowboy myth. we see ourselves as rugged individualists and self-made people. the land of opportunity, the free and the brave. we somehow miss the ways we are dependent, interdependent and connected to each other and the rest of the world.
2. the white hat myth. we believe that as a nation we are always on the side of right. we are in so much denial that we cannot tolerate any question about it, and become outraged if one is raised. note, for example, that we have had no national “why did they do this?” conversation about the 9/11 events — we are satisfied with “terrorists who hate freedom.”
3. adolescence. we are a young country and are in an adolescent (male) phase, nationally. i can’t remember where i first heard this idea but it isn’t mine: as a nation we are all swagger and strut. we have gasoline in our blood, are completely self-centered and seem to enjoy annoying neighbors and torturing things. we are concrete thinkers — black/white, right/wrong, good/bad, us/them — and believe we’re immortal. we are outraged when anyone else is in the wrong but we cannot see our own faults.
these things conspire to make several things impossible which might get us to better answers.
— articulated principles. we believe we know what’s right without much thought. it’s an emotional gut-level knowing. when this is the case, vengeance — an old brain response — is easy to drum up.
— careful reflection, thorough examination and open debate. these are more costly and require good leadership. it’s much easier to look for a bad guy to blame.
— empathy. without empathy we are unable to take a more compassionate approach. we can’t put ourselves in the shoes of any but the victims, so fear is easy to tap, and fear makes both compassion and reasoned debate difficult. without empathy, we are also unable to imagine that the wrongful conviction might happen to us, which would motivate us to ensure a fair (and at least partially reversible) process.
— an examination of the costs and flaws of the death penalty. this might motivate us to find another solution, but we are unable to examine, much less analyze or criticize the system.
— a system view. we are unable to focus on prevention or treatment, because this would require a look at the way an individual operates within a system. we can only consider punishment, and when punishment doesn’t work, we just need more punishment. taken to its logical end, we see only one response to criminal behavior and need the most extreme punishment for the worst of the worst (or for when we are most emotional).
the u.s. is young. france and many other countries are older. i remember being struck by how history is everywhere in france. this makes for a longer view and a better memory.
i believe the u.s. is slowly outgrowing the death penalty, but the path is not linear. dna exonerations are slowly bubbling up into our national consciousness and demanding attention to the brokenness of the system. race — a major issue in the death penalty — is more in the forefront today. good groundwork has been laid. things are shifting. much will depend on the next administration. i have some hope that with the right leadership, we can get through this difficult adolescence and take a more mature stance.
Labels: death penalty